Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
New Topic  
Sodamafia Sodamafia
wrote...
Posts: 116
Rep: 0 0
2 years ago
Stella bought a cup of coffee at the drive-through window at a coffee shop. Holding the cup between her knees and attempting to take off the lid to add cream, she spilled the coffee. She suffered burns to her thighs. If this happened in Canada, which of the following is true?

▸ If the court finds the plaintiff contributorily negligent, causing 60% of her loss, Stella must suffer that portion of the loss and will not be compensated for it by the defendant.

▸ To succeed with the defence that Stella volunteered to take the risk, the coffee shop would have to prove that Stella deliberately spilled the coffee.

▸ If Stella sues the coffee shop for negligence, she will only have to prove that the company owed her a duty of care.

▸ If the coffee shop claims there was no way to reasonably foresee that Stella would be harmed, the plaintiff's case would be dismissed even though Stella suffered burns.

▸ If Stella sues the coffee shop, the company's best argument is that it didn't owe her a duty of care.
Textbook 
Legal Fundamentals for Canadian Business

Legal Fundamentals for Canadian Business


Edition: 4th
Author:
Read 426 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
GrouchoGroucho
wrote...
Posts: 62
Rep: 1 0
2 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

Sodamafia Author
wrote...

2 years ago
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
wrote...

Yesterday
You make an excellent tutor!
wrote...

2 hours ago
This calls for a celebration Person Raising Both Hands in Celebration
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  970 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 177
  
 413
  
 211
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 431