Top Posters
Since Sunday
g
3
3
2
J
2
p
2
m
2
h
2
s
2
r
2
d
2
l
2
a
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
ebinilucas ebinilucas
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 11
Rep: 0 0
8 years ago
 In Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. ___ (2010) (which can also be found in the Resources link), the Supreme Court considered the position of suspects who understand their right to remain silent under Miranda v. Arizona and are aware that they have the right to remain silent, but do not explicitly invoke or waive the right.  Please read the case, then summarize the facts of the case and discuss the court's opinion (both majority and dissent).
Read 479 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer accepted by topic starter
ebinilucas Authorebinilucas
wrote...
#1
Posts: 11
Rep: 0 0
8 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
This verified answer contains over 680 words.
1

Related Topics
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1088 People Browsing
 149 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 4423
  
 180
  
 274
Your Opinion
Previous poll results: Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?