× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
o
5
4
m
4
b
4
x
4
a
4
l
4
t
4
S
4
m
3
s
3
New Topic  
bugnsprout bugnsprout
wrote...
Posts: 21
Rep: 1 0
11 years ago
Why isn't technetium produced in stars? Technetium #43 on the periodic table is a man made element. However, it is my understanding that stars produce all elements found in nature by fusion (i.e hydrogen into hellium, hellium into lithium, etc, etc..)

But when a star gets to Molybdenum #42, I would assume that the next element would be Technetium #43, why does it skip it to produce Ruthenium #44 ? I hope I'm making sense with my question, thank you.
Read 423 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
Staff Member
9 months ago
The reason it doesn't occur is because all of its isotopes are radioactive, with the longest-lived ones having a half-life of just a few million years. Even if the Earth was created with significant amounts of it, the odds are minuscule that there's even one atom of it left by now, after more than four billion years have passed.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1076 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 467
  
 4913
  
 202
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 387

Previous poll results: How often do you eat-out per week?