× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
g
3
3
2
J
2
p
2
m
2
h
2
s
2
r
2
d
2
l
2
a
2
New Topic  
Stapler Stapler
wrote...
Posts: 2
Rep: 0 0
11 years ago Edited: 11 years ago, Stapler
I have a few questions about obligate ram ventilators.

Are all fish without a Operculum (and therefore unable to function a bucal-opecular pump) obligate ram ventilators?
Are all Elasmobrancii obligate ram ventilators?
When non-obligate ram ventilators are ram ventilating do they relax their bucal and opecular muscles or do the respiratory have to contract to keep the cavity open?

Is this an accurate description of the bucal-opercular pump system?


Thanks for your help.
Read 3270 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
Staff Member
2 years ago
Ram ventilation is a simpler process in which a fish swims forward with its mouth open, taking in water that passes over the gills. The drawback to ram ventilation is that the fish has to swim continuously to be able to continue breathing.

A lot of sharks breathe this way, as do some large bony fish swimmers like tunas and billfishes.

Many fishes, including sharks like the sand tiger shark, can switch between buccal pumping and ram ventilation as the situation and their swimming speed dictates.

You might think that the need to swim continuously for ram ventilation would be quite inefficient in terms of a fish’s energy requirements, compared to sitting in one place and breathing by buccal pumping.

Research with remoras – bony fishes that can switch between the two fish breathing methods – found that maintaining the same volume of water/gill flow with buccal pumping consumed as much as 5.1 percent more energy for the fish than ram ventilation.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1153 People Browsing
 107 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 286
  
 1678
  
 2582
Your Opinion
Who's your favorite biologist?
Votes: 586