× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
o
5
4
m
4
b
4
x
4
a
4
l
4
t
4
S
4
m
3
s
3
New Topic  
nursing111 nursing111
wrote...
Posts: 31
Rep: 0 0
11 years ago
Would you just add a catalyst?  If so what could be a catalyst for a radioactive decay?
Read 560 times
5 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
11 years ago
You cannot change the half-life; not with a catalyst, high temperature, or high pressure. It is set foever.r
wrote...
11 years ago
I'd accelerate everything but that element to near the speed of light.  Einstein's theory of relativity would state that the element would have aged must faster than everything else!

TADA!!!
wrote...
11 years ago
There is no way to speed up the rate of decay.
wrote...
11 years ago
Radioactive decay is a spontaneous process, and involves the nucleus only, and so any chemical catalyst will have no effect as they only affect the electrons.  

In essence, decay is more of a physical process rather than chemical.  

We could bombard the element with protons/neutrons/alpha/beta radiation to force the atoms to become more unstable and decay faster.  This is done in nuclear fission reactors to uranium (half life = 7 x 10^8 yrs!) with neutrons to cause the chain reaction.  

Problem is the products are usually radioactive themselves, with long half lives (hence radioactive waste from power stations).
wrote...
11 years ago
The decay rate of radioactive material is a constant. You can check that by looking at the formula that defines it (e^kt), k is a constant ratio of decay, t is the specific time. If decay rate could be altered by a catalyse or temperature then C14 or U238 dating would not be accurate.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  973 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 179
  
 367
  
 214