Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
New Topic  
bigcaat bigcaat
wrote...
Posts: 640
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
For the most part, Canadian courts apply modified principles of negligence to determine liability. Some critics of fault-based systems propose that victims be compensated through “no-fault” government schemes—similar to those already in place relating to motor vehicle accidents and workers compensation. Others argue that the law should impose “strict liability” in all areas in which plaintiffs have traditionally struggled to establish fault, namely, against manufacturers of goods or products. Explain the three bases for awarding compensation to injured parties and the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Textbook 
The Law and Business Administration in Canada

The Law and Business Administration in Canada


Edition: 14th
Authors:
Read 55 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
AlexStanfordAlexStanford
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 734
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
This verified answer contains over 360 words.
1

Related Topics

bigcaat Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Brilliant
wrote...

Yesterday
Good timing, thanks!
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1199 People Browsing
 115 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 635
  
 288
  
 234
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 370