Dolly, an architect, lives in Pennsylvania, which is a comparative negligence state. While she is ...

Dolly, an architect, lives in Pennsylvania, which is a comparative negligence state. While she is inspecting a construction site for a large building she designed, she is injured when a worker drops a hammer from two stories up. Dolly was not wearing a safety helmet at the time. Dolly sues the construction company. The jury concludes that Dolly has suffered 100,000 in damages. The jury also believes that Dolly was 30 percent liable for the accident, and the construction company was 70 percent liable. Outcome?
 a. Dolly wins nothing.
  b. Dolly wins 30,000.
  c. Dolly wins 50,000.
  d. Dolly wins 70,000.
  e. Dolly wins 100,000.