× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
o
6
6
G
3
c
3
q
3
m
3
j
3
s
2
b
2
j
2
u
2
j
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
skebart skebart
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 564
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, a maker of leather goods would not sell to stores that would not follow its pricing policy (resale price maintenance). The Supreme Court held that:
 a. all vertical price fixing subject to a per se rule of illegality
  b. resale price maintenance that injures intrabrand competition would be generally illegal c. vertical price restraints injure the ability of sellers to compete so are generally illegal
  d. vertical price fixing of minimum prices is subject to a per se rule of illegality e. none of the other choices
Read 45 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
sweetpeajezzysweetpeajezzy
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1115
Rep: 6 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

skebart Author
wrote...

6 years ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
lierac00
wrote...

Yesterday
You make an excellent tutor!
gmiannotti
wrote...

2 hours ago
Smart ... Thanks!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1130 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 243
  
 252
  
 295
Your Opinion
Who will win the 2024 president election?
Votes: 10
Closes: November 4
Previous poll results: What's your favorite math subject?