× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
L
4
d
4
3
k
3
k
3
j
3
k
3
b
3
f
3
b
3
d
3
h
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
Salmams Salmams
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 693
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
According to the Supreme Court opinion in Herring v. U.S. (2009), involving a search pursuant to an active arrest warrant that was later discovered to have been recalled several months earlier:
 
  a. evidence obtained by officers who honestly believe they are acting lawfully is admissible.
  b. the good faith of officers is irrelevant to the determination whether or not to exclude evidence.
  c. all evidence seized pursuant to a search not based on probable cause must be excluded.
  d. the evidence seized pursuant to the search is admissible if the police acted objectively, in reasonably goodfaith and the error in record keeping was negligent but not reckless
Read 42 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
fahadrfahadr
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 929
Rep: 2 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Salmams Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Smart ... Thanks!
dearsophia21
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
dianeflunder
wrote...

2 hours ago
This site is awesome
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1165 People Browsing
 101 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 121
  
 346
  
 347
Your Opinion
How often do you eat-out per week?
Votes: 80
Previous poll results: Does a gender wage gap exist in America?