Top Posters
Since Sunday
A
6
j
6
c
5
m
5
C
5
d
5
s
5
n
4
i
4
d
4
d
4
J
4
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
lovedarian lovedarian
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 110
Rep: 0 0
2 years ago
Delbert stops at a yard sale to look for old musical equipment. He sees an amplifier that is exactly what he has been looking for. Delbert believes it is worth a lot more money than the $50 the owner is requesting. Delbert asks the owner whether or not the amplifier is in good working condition. The owner tells him that he knows nothing about the amplifier and is not prepared to comment further. Delbert purchases the amplifier for $50. Later he finds out that it had been stolen from a nearby music store and did not belong to the owner at the time he purchased it. Delbert's action for recovery of his money against the owner will:

▸ succeed because the music store will likely pay him a reward.

▸ fail because the owner made no representations about the amplifier.

▸ fail because of the principle of caveat emptor.

▸ fail because the goods are bought by description.

▸ succeed because the owner breached an implied term as to title.
Textbook 
Legal Fundamentals for Canadian Business

Legal Fundamentals for Canadian Business


Edition: 4th
Author:
Read 90 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
DustbunsDustbuns
wrote...
#1
Posts: 76
Rep: 0 0
2 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

lovedarian Author
wrote...

2 years ago
Smart ... Thanks!
shangshang
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks for your help!!
homework1
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  647 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 356
  
 284
  
 173