× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
L
3
d
3
y
3
a
3
n
3
d
3
e
3
d
3
c
3
p
3
M
3
a
3
New Topic  
bugbugs4 bugbugs4
wrote...
Posts: 86
Rep: 0 0
11 years ago Edited: 11 years ago, bio_man
I wonder, how people invented the constant e which often called Euler's number or base of natural logrithm and e is also an irrational number.

For instance, I know pi which is  ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter and it is also a constant and of course an irrational number.

And Golden mean is also a constant which is ratio of line to its larger segment is equal to ratio of the larger segment to its smaller segment. And you can Golden mean almost everywhere in the nature, i.e. your own body.
Read 676 times
5 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
11 years ago
e first came about during John Napier's studies of logarithms, although the first calculations of it appear to have been in the work of Bernoulli:

lim (as n -> inf) of (1 + 1/n)^n

In fact, outside the sciences, the place where e most often occurs naturally is in the financial world.

When interest on an investment is compounded, we talk about the "compounding period": interest can be compounded annually, monthly, daily.  The formulas for the change in value of an investment is:

A = P·(1 + r/n)^(nt)

where A = the final amount, P = the principal, r = the annual interest rate, n = the number of compounding periods per year, and t = the number of years.

When money is compounded annually, n = 1; when it's compounded monthly, n = 12; and when it's compounded daily, n = 365 (though sometimes banks use 360, to simplify calculations).

See how n is going up?  So what happens if we compound every hour?  every minute? every second?  In fact, if we "compound continuously," then we're letting n approach infinity, and the function actually becomes

A = P·e^(rt)

There are a couple articles linked below that give more info.  Hope that answers your question!
wrote...
11 years ago
It seems that Napier sort of made it up, perhaps working on a limit for the formula S = P (1 + r / n)^nt  [compound interest]
wrote...
11 years ago
The irrational numbers are a necessity to explain certain phenomena of mathematics. For example, it is very simple to demonstrate that the square root of two cannot be a rational number (a number that one can write as the quotient of two integers).
The proof goes like this:
Assume that there is such a number, i.e. that (p/q)^2 = 2. We assume here also that p and q share no factor (if they do, we merely remove it to obtain two numbers that share no factors).
Then by simple rules of high school algebra we can rearrange a little to get p^2 = 2*(q^2)
Thus p^2 is even.
This implies that p is even (since the square of an odd number must be odd).
Then we can write: p=2*r where r is simply half of p and a whole number.
Thus we can write: (2*r)^2 = 2 * (q^2), which reduces to
4*(r^2)=2*(q^2)
and further to 2 * (r^2) = q^2.
But by the same reasoning, this implies that q is even. So we have both p and q being even, which implies that they share a factor and can be reduced. This contradicts our starting hypotheses, so we can conclude that there does not exist a rational number whose square is two. Thus there must be at least one irrational number. Ultimately is is relatively simple to show that there are, in a mathematical sense, "more" irrational numbers than rational ones.

As for e, e can be derived in many ways. It can be written as the sum of one over n factorial as n goes from zero to infinity. It can be written as the limit that people have already described. Most significantly however, the existence of "e" can be derived as the solution to the problem of finding a function whose derivative is itself. Most students usually encounter this process in their Real Analysis courses in college. The actual process is somewhat laborious and tedious, but suffice to say that the existence of "e" is strongly supported by centuries of mathematical analysis.

As others have already explained, "e" has been shown to have a wide range of applications, even outside of mathematics, in fields such as economics, engineering, and other science-related disciplines.
wrote...
11 years ago
The way I remember it, you start out trying to solve the  f'(x) = 1/x.  If you start looking at the properties of f(x) you find that it is a logarithmic function. The next question is "What is the base?" solving that leads to e.

The concept of irrational numbers goes back to the Greeks who proved that the solution to the equation x^2 - 2 = 0 couldn't be represented as a fraction.
wrote...
11 years ago
Calculate (1 + 1/n)^n.
The bigger you choose n the more the answer goes to Euler's number e = 2.71828... .

Calculate 1/0! + 1/1! + 1/2! + 1/3! + ... .
0! =1! =1. -----  5! = 1x2x3x4x5
The further you go, the close you come to e.

The slope of the graph of the function f(x) = e^x = exp(x) is in each point equal to the value of that function. In short: for any x is f(x) = f'(x).
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1132 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 21
  
 164
  
 554