× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
j
3
s
3
j
2
J
2
e
2
n
2
t
2
d
2
b
2
t
2
J
2
b
2
New Topic  
Lalalili67 Lalalili67
wrote...
Posts: 455
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
The nurse is preparing a patient for a procedure. The patient has signed a consent form but states, I don't really know anything about this procedure. I wonder if there is something else I could do instead? How should the nurse proceed?
 
  1. Continue with the preparation as consent may not be revoked.
  2. Try to convince the patient to go through with the procedure.
  3. Stop the preparation as the patient can revoke consent at any time.
  4. Have the patient document the question in writing since the original consent was written.



A representative from a drug company tells a group of nurses that one of the company's products is unavoidably unsafe. How should the nurses interpret this information?
 
  Note: Credit will be given only if all correct choices and no incorrect choices are selected.
  Select all that apply.
  1. The drug has risks that cannot be eliminated.
  2. The benefits of using the medication outweigh its risks.
  3. The medication has been recalled by the manufacturer.
  4. Patients who have been administered this medication are very likely to have severe side effects.
  5. There is no safer medication to use an alternative.



In which situations would the manufacturer of a drug designated as unavoidably unsafe be held liable for injuries to a patient receiving the drug?
 
  Note: Credit will be given only if all correct choices and no incorrect choices are selected.
  Select all that apply.
  1. The physician did not educate the patient about the risks of the medication.
  2. The physician prescribed the medication after being told that problems with the drug had been corrected.
  3. The nurse was not warned of risks by the pharmacist.
  4. The nurse did not educate the patient about the risks of the drug.
  5. The information printed in the drug information sheet accompanying the medication was wrong.



The plaintiff was injured by a defective intravenous catheter. In order to win a product liability case, what must the plaintiff prove first?
 
  1. The intravenous catheter was defective.
  2. The intravenous catheter was used incorrectly.
  3. The intravenous catheter was sold to him.
  4. The hospital purchases the poorly manufactured intravenous catheters.
Textbook 
Legal & Ethical Issues in Nursing

Legal & Ethical Issues in Nursing


Edition: 7th
Author:
Read 376 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
3
Rationale: Since the patient has expressed lack of knowledge about the procedure, the preparation should not be continued.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

1,2,5
Rationale: One of the criteria for an unavoidably unsafe product is that it has risks that cannot be eliminated.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

2,5
Rationale: In this case the physician would be at fault for not educating the patient.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

3
Rationale: Proving the catheter was defective is not the first step that must be accomplished in a products liability case.
Lalalili67 Author
wrote...
6 years ago
Thank you
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  765 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 1222
  
 344
  
 173
Your Opinion
Where do you get your textbooks?
Votes: 447