Top Posters
Since Sunday
c
5
j
5
a
5
L
5
f
5
j
5
D
4
k
4
y
4
t
4
h
4
l
4
New Topic  
kj2007qd kj2007qd
wrote...
Posts: 104
Rep: 0 0
2 years ago
The facts of a case heard by the Supreme Court of Canada are as follows: Mr. and Mrs. H were induced to sign a mortgage in favour of M.C.R. Ltd. by Johnston, a man living with their daughter. Johnston led them to believe that the document was an unimportant amendment to an existing mortgage when, in reality, it was a substantial second mortgage on their home. Neither read the document nor questioned it. When the payments were in arrears, the mortgage company took an action for foreclosure (to take the home). Mr. and Mrs. H. pleaded non est factum. Would this defence succeed? If so, why; if not, why not?
Textbook 
Legal Fundamentals for Canadian Business

Legal Fundamentals for Canadian Business


Edition: 4th
Author:
Read 342 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
CodebreakerCodebreaker
wrote...
Posts: 90
Rep: 3 0
2 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here

Related Topics

kj2007qd Author
wrote...

2 years ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
wrote...

Yesterday
Smart ... Thanks!
wrote...

2 hours ago
Correct Slight Smile TY
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  945 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 589
  
 879
  
 181
Your Opinion
Which country would you like to visit for its food?
Votes: 215