× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Family Studies
New Topic  
lesley lesley
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 616
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Mills (1958) had elementary school children compete for attractive prizes. The children could cheat to win the prizes, but they didn't know that the experimenter would be assured of detecting the cheaters. Some children cheated, and others did not.
 
  The next day,
  a. none of the students endorsed cheating as acceptable.
  b. those who had cheated earlier became more lenient in their attitudes about cheating.
  c. those who didn't cheat earlier became more lenient in their attitudes about cheating.
  d. when they were offered a large inducement to cheat, most students cheated.
Read 61 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
jaycearledgejaycearledge
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 738
Rep: 2 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

lesley Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Helped a lot
patyfeitosa
wrote...

Yesterday
Correct Slight Smile TY
novae
wrote...

2 hours ago
this is exactly what I needed
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1173 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 1570
  
 366
  
 25
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 431
Previous poll results: Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?