In U.S. Steel Corp v. Fortner Enterprises, U.S. Steel loaned Fortner money to buy mobile homes from ...

In U.S. Steel Corp v. Fortner Enterprises, U.S. Steel loaned Fortner money to buy mobile homes from the company to put in his mobile home park, the Supreme Court held that it was:
 a. illegal for U.S. Steel to tie the sale of the homes to the financing
  b. an illegal boycott for U.S. Steel to refuse to lend the money once they sold the homes c. illegal for the homes to be sold with the financing since it created an exclusive deal
  d. not price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act to fix the home price together with the financing rate
  e. none of the other choices