× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
7
6
o
5
b
4
s
3
j
3
b
3
m
3
K
3
g
3
L
3
w
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
ruthayak ruthayak
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 580
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Certified Fire Protection v. Precision Construction, Precision accepted a winning bid from Certified for it to install a fire suppression sprinkler system. Later the two parties got into a fight over some details in the contract, which was never signed. The courts held that the contract was:
 a. properly accepted, so there was a binding contract
  b. accepted with minor modifications that were not critical to the intent of the contract, so it was binding
  c. never formed because the Statute of Limitations had been violated due to the fact that it would take more than a year to complete
  d. never formed because Certified was not licensed by the state to do such work
  e. none of the other choices
Read 91 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
JMENDEZJMENDEZ
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1133
Rep: 4 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

ruthayak Author
wrote...

6 years ago
This site is awesome
deathwing
wrote...

Yesterday
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
patod1
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1080 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 357
  
 112
  
 810
Your Opinion
Previous poll results: Should Ph.D.'s be addressed as doctors?