× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
y
2
m
2
m
2
u
2
m
2
B
2
M
2
e
2
k
2
N
2
y
2
m
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
richardsmither7 richardsmither7
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 332
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Southern Pacific Co v. Arizona, concerning whether Arizona could, for safety considerations, require trains traveling through the state be a shorter length than trains traveling through other states. The Supreme Court held the Arizona law was:
 a. valid because it concerned a legitimate state interest to improve transportation safety b. valid because Congress had not passed legislation dealing with the length of trains
  c. valid because it did not conflict with federal standards d. invalid because it impeded interstate commerce
  e. none of the other choices
Read 65 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
KojicoKojico
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1145
Rep: 6 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

richardsmither7 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
this is exactly what I needed
kamikazekota
wrote...

Yesterday
This site is awesome
lierac00
wrote...

2 hours ago
Brilliant ツ
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  658 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 320
  
 390
  
 1158
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 437
Previous poll results: Which 'study break' activity do you find most distracting?