× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
s
3
v
3
p
3
m
2
s
2
d
2
N
2
d
2
e
2
s
2
s
2
e
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
Jcasp Jcasp
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 539
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
William Pajak married his third wife, Audrey, one day after they entered into a prenuptial agreement by which Audrey waived any and all interests in William's estate. William had four children from his two previous marriages and wished for his property to go to them. Audrey was a secretary at Carolina Furniture Company, William's business. She had a tenth-grade education and did not read the agreement before signing it. The agreement was drafted by William's lawyer, and the lawyer was present while Audrey signed the agreement. Audrey also indicated that she knew William owned the furniture store, but she knew of no other holdings. In fact, William's property and estate were quite extensive. Shortly after their marriage, William passed away. Audrey claimed an interest in the estate because the prenuptial agreement was invalid. The children claim that Audrey understood the agreement and chose not to seek advice. Should Audrey be entitled to a spouse's share of the estate?
Read 62 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
dmnorthamdmnortham
wrote...
#1
Posts: 216
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Jcasp Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thanks for your help!!
Katey_maree
wrote...

Yesterday
Smart ... Thanks!
DragonHeart
wrote...

2 hours ago
Correct Slight Smile TY
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1220 People Browsing
 109 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 1144
  
 304
  
 578
Your Opinion
What's your favorite funny biology word?
Votes: 401
Previous poll results: What's your favorite math subject?