× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
s
3
3
d
3
s
2
c
2
G
2
y
2
t
2
2
k
2
j
2
e
2
New Topic  
colleen colleen
wrote...
Valued Member
Posts: 17076
12 years ago
M. Huston (1994b) pointed out that the well-documented pattern of increasing annual primary production from the poles to the equator is strongly influenced by the longer growing season at low latitudes. The following data are from table 14.10 in Huston. The data cited by Huston are from Whittaker and Likens (1975).
Annual    Length of       Monthly
NPP       Growing Season    NPP
Forest Type             (t/ha/yr)    (months)       (t/ha/mo)
Boreal forest             8       3          2.7
Temperate forest          13       6          ?
Tropical forest          20       12          ?_______   

Complete the missing data to compare the monthly production of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests. How does this short-term perspective of primary production in high-, middle-, and low-latitude forests compare to an annual perspective? How does the short-term perspective change our perception of tropical versus high-latitude forests?
Read 1573 times
1 Reply
Sunshine ☀ ☼

Related Topics

Replies
qew
wrote...
12 years ago
Forest Type   Annual   Length of Growing   Monthly
   NPP   Season   NPP
   (t/ha/yr)   (Months)   (t/ha/mo)
Boreal forest   8   3   2.7
Temperate forest   13   6   2.2
Tropical forest   20   12   1.7

Conclusions based on this short-term perspective would be exactly opposite those made using the long term perspective. Monthly primary production in high-, middle-, and low-latitude forests shows that, although growing seasons are shorter in boreal and temperate forests, the rate of primary production during growing season is higher.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1182 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 110
  
 504
  
 1082
Your Opinion
What's your favorite coffee beverage?
Votes: 302