× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
w
5
a
3
j
2
a
2
t
2
u
2
r
2
j
2
j
2
l
2
d
2
y
2
New Topic  
1b 1b
wrote...
Posts: 958
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
A five-year-old child is on chemotherapy for rhabdomyosarcoma. Despite antiemetics, the child complains of nausea. The mother wants the child to eat and is pushing the child to eat the food.
 
  The nurse would talk with the mother and suggest that she not push the food on the nauseated child because: 1. The child does not need to eat as he is on intravenous fluids.
  2. Forcing the child to eat may lead to a food aversion for the child.
  3. Vomiting can lead to damage to the stomach.
  4. Pushing the child to eat leads to a psychological conflict that may turn the child away from the parent.
Read 48 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
2
Rationale 1: Intravenous fluids do not replace normal food intake.
Rationale 2: If the child is forced to eat and then vomits, the child can develop a food aversion in which the child associates that food with vomiting.
Rationale 3: Vomiting is unpleasant but does not usually lead to stomach damage.
Rationale 4: This is not a correct statement. Parents and children often disagree, but the child will still relate to the parent.
Global
1b Author
wrote...
6 years ago
Confirmed correct
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  854 People Browsing
 127 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 336
  
 212
  
 382
Your Opinion