× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
L
4
d
4
3
k
3
k
3
j
3
k
3
b
3
f
3
b
3
d
3
h
3
Home Q & A Board Biology-Related Homework Help Medicine Nursing and Clinical
New Topic  
Jay Cardio Jay Cardio
wrote...
Posts: 995
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
The parents of an 11-year-old boy who is dying from cancer are concerned that he is not eating. Which intervention would serve both the parents' and child's needs?
 
  A) Urging the child to eat one good meal per day
  B) Serving small meals of things the child likes
  C) Straightening up around the child before meals
  D) Administering antiemetics as ordered for nausea
Read 17 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
#1
6 years ago
Ans: B
The child is more likely to eat small amounts of foods of his choosing. This accommodates the child's reduced appetite, reassures his parents that he is not starving, and gives the child a sense of control. Straightening up the child's area before meals provides a more pleasant eating environment. The use of antiemetics controls nausea but may not increase appetite. Urging the child to eat a substantial meal is unnecessary and creates stress.
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1132 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 404
  
 248
  
 156
Your Opinion
How often do you eat-out per week?
Votes: 80
Previous poll results: Who will win the 2024 president election?