× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
p
4
h
4
c
4
d
3
3
c
3
t
3
u
3
A
3
B
3
j
3
s
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
riley.hively riley.hively
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 710
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In certain types of checkpoints and roadblocks, no individualized suspicion for any driver or vehicle is required. However, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Indianapolis v. Edmond held unconstitutional the use of a roadblock to detect criminal wrongdoing. Explain this case as an exception to the general rule on roadblocks. Do these roadblock cases allowing suspicionless intrusions establish dangerous precedents which will greatly weaken Fourth Amendment protections? Explain your position and provide examples.
 
  What will be an ideal response?
Read 34 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
123qwer121123qwer121
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 989
Rep: 11 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

riley.hively Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thanks
gma_of_7
wrote...

Yesterday
You make an excellent tutor!
smdavis
wrote...

2 hours ago
This helped my grade so much Perfect
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1111 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 291
  
 2347
  
 322
Your Opinion
Previous poll results: How often do you eat-out per week?