× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
j
3
s
3
j
2
J
2
e
2
n
2
t
2
d
2
b
2
t
2
J
2
b
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
vincent_pijen vincent_pijen
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 731
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
According to the Supreme Court in Mapp v. Ohio, leaving the Fourth Amendment's protection from illegal searches and seizures to solutions other than the exclusionary rule had been effective.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Read 53 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
EmilyMM265EmilyMM265
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1004
Rep: 2 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

vincent_pijen Author
wrote...

6 years ago
This calls for a celebration Person Raising Both Hands in Celebration
Roselalo
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
sweetalia
wrote...

2 hours ago
Helped a lot
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  874 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 3590
  
 3444
  
 1241
Your Opinion
Who will win the 2024 president election?
Votes: 119
Closes: November 4
Previous poll results: Who will win the 2024 president election?