× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
I
3
p
2
w
2
y
2
J
2
Q
2
r
2
o
2
e
2
j
2
d
2
T
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
aj20386 aj20386
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 735
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Brigham City Utah v. Charles Stuart and Others (2006), involving police entering a home without a warrant where teenagers were partying, drinking, and officers observed an altercation occurring inside the home, the Supreme Court ruled that:
 
  a. the officers' entry of the home without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment.
  b. the officers had a right to enter without a warrant because they feared the teens would flee from the house ifthey waited.
 c. the officers had the right to enter without a warrant because they had an objectively reasonable basis forbelieving someone in the home was seriously injured or being threatened with imminent injury.
 d. the officers should have called an ambulance and let the EMTs enter without a warrant.
Read 40 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
laquelaque
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 935
Rep: 1 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

aj20386 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Correct Slight Smile TY
cipcal
wrote...

Yesterday
This helped my grade so much Perfect
7.prime7105
wrote...

2 hours ago
Good timing, thanks!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1722 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 659
  
 235
  
 752
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 437
Previous poll results: What's your favorite coffee beverage?