× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
y
2
m
2
m
2
u
2
m
2
B
2
M
2
e
2
k
2
N
2
y
2
m
2
New Topic  
LMD LMD
wrote...
6 years ago
The students in one gym class receive a self-esteem program as part of their sports training. To evaluate the program, a researcher measures self-esteem for the students before and after the program and compares their scores with those from another class that did not receive the program but was measured at the same two times. What kind of design is being used?
 
  a. between-subjects design
  b. within-subjects design
 c. repeated measures design
  d. mixed design



What is compensatory rivalry? Illustrate with an example.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



In a changing-criterion design
 
  a. changes in behavior are measured at different points in time.
  b. changes in behavior cannot be attributed to the reinforcement contingency.
  c. the criterion for reinforcement remains constant over the course of the experiment.
  d. the criterion for reinforcement is changed over the course of the experiment.



A two-factor study with two levels of factor A and three levels of factor B uses a separate group of n = 5 participants in each treatment condition. How many participants are needed for the entire study?
 
  a. 5
 b. 10
  c. 25
  d. 30



What is the regression threat in a single group design?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



In a multiple-baseline design
 
  a. the length of the baseline period is the same for all of the subjects in the experiment.
  b. the behavior of the subjects is expected to revert to baseline levels after the removal of the independent variable.
 c. the length of the baseline period is different for different subjects or different behaviors prior to the introduction of the independent variable.
 d. the occurrence of carryover effects cannot be assessed.



Which outcome is possible in a 2 x 2 factorial design?
 
  a. four main effects and no interaction
 b. four main effects and no interaction
 c. no main effect for either factor but an interaction
  d. four interactions



What is the history threat in a single group design?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



An alternating-treatments is designed is used
 
  a. when several samples of the subjects' behavior in different conditions of the experiment are desired in a small-n design that precludes counterbalancing.
 b. when there is no danger of a carryover effect.
  c. when the experimenter has matched the experimental and control groups.
  d. when there is no baseline measure of the dependent variable.



Which outcome is possible in a 2 x 2 factorial design?
 
  a. two main effects and two interactions
 b. a main effect for one factor, no main effect for the other factor, and two interactions
  c. no main effect for either factor and one interaction
 d. a four-way interaction
Read 47 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
d

- - - - - - - - - - - -

In compensatory rivalry, the comparison group knows what the program group is getting and develops a competitive attitude with the program group. The participants in the comparison group might see the program the other group is getting and feel jealous. This could lead them to compete with the program group just to show how well they can do. Sometimes, in contexts like these, the participants are even encouraged by well-meaning administrators to compete with each other. (Although this might make organizational sense as a motivation for the participants in both groups to work harder, it works against the ability of researchers to see the effects of their program.) If the rivalry between groups affects posttest performance, it could make it more difficult to detect the effects of the program. As with diffusion and imitation, this threat generally equalizes the posttest performance across groups, increasing the chance that you won't see a program effect, even if the program is effective.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

D

- - - - - - - - - - - -

d

- - - - - - - - - - - -

A regression threat to internal validity, also known as a regression artifact or regression to the mean, is a statistical phenomenon that falsely makes it appear that your group changed to be more like the overall population between the pretest and posttest. If your group was above the population average on the pretest, they will look like they lost ground on the posttest. If they were below the population average on the pretest, they will falsely appear to improve. Regression occurs whenever you have a nonrandom sample from a population and two measures that are imperfectly correlated.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

C

- - - - - - - - - - - -

c

- - - - - - - - - - - -

When some event other than your program occurs at the same time and affects the outcome, we say there is a history threat to internal validity. It's not your program that caused the outcome; it's something else, some other event that occurred between the pretest and the posttest. We refer to this other event as an historical one, because it is something that happens during the course of your study; it, like your program, is an event in history, so to speak.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

A

- - - - - - - - - - - -

c
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  517 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 326
  
 7289
  
 172
Your Opinion
Which country would you like to visit for its food?
Votes: 263