When identification procedures violate constitutional provisions, the results from such procedures cannot be considered:
a. reliable.
b. accurate.
c. admissible in a criminal trial.
d. All of the above
(Question #2) Which of the following helps ensure a reliable lineup?
a. At least five people appear in the lineup.
b. All persons in the lineup have the same physical characteristics.
c. The suspect should be permitted to choose his or her place in line.
d. All of the above
(Question #3) In which case did the Supreme Court hold that an illegally-conducted lineup does not invalidate later identifications resulting from an independent source?
a. Gideon v. Wainwright
b. Mapp v. Ohio
c. United States v. Wade
d. Miranda v. Arizona
(Question #4) If a suspect refuses to participate in a lineup, he or she can be cited with contempt and the prosecutor may comment at trial about the suspect's refusal to cooperate.
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
(Question #5) A suspect cannot choose his or her place in line during a police lineup.
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
(Question #6) Everyone in a lineup should wear different clothing in order to standout from one another.
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
(Question #7) The exclusionary rule operates differently in the confessions/interrogation context (compared to in the Fourth Amendment context). Explain the difference.
What will be an ideal response?
Quick Reply
