The Supreme Court case in which the Court held that both houses of state legislatures must be based on population and that the population in the districts from which legislators are elected has to be substantially equal was
A) Baker v. Carr.
B) Colgrove v. Green.
C) Reynolds v. Sims.
D) Wesberry v. Sanders.
E) Marbury v. Madison.
Question -2-The Supreme Court case in which the Court held that voters could utilize the courts to challenge the Tennessee state legislature's refusal to reapportion state legislative districts was
A) Baker v. Carr.
B) Colgrove v. Green.
C) Reynolds v. Sims.
D) Wesberry v. Sanders.
E) Marbury v. Madison.
Question -3-The Supreme Court case in which the Court decided that it ought not enter this political thicket of reapportionment was
A) Baker v. Carr.
B) Colgrove v. Green.
C) Reynolds v. Sims.
D) Wesberry v. Sanders.
E) Marbury v. Madison.
Question -4-The basis upon which the reapportionment cases established the principle of one person, one vote was the Supreme Court's interpretation of
A) the Fourteenth Amendment.
B) the Nineteenth Amendment.
C) the Twenty-sixth Amendment.
D) the First Amendment.
E) the Second Amendment.