Top Posters
Since Sunday
y
2
m
2
m
2
u
2
m
2
B
2
M
2
e
2
k
2
N
2
y
2
m
2
New Topic  
brendenxoxo21 brendenxoxo21
wrote...
Posts: 184
Rep: 0 0
3 years ago
As part of a study examining the role of different teaching methods on children's math abilities, Dr. Garneau tested the children using a standardized math test. In Year 1, the standard teaching method was used. In Year 2, a new teaching method was used. In Year 1, the test was administered in October, near the beginning of the school year. In Year 2, the test was administered in May, near the end of the school year. Although Dr. Garneau's results suggest that children in Year 2 demonstrated more math skills than children in Year 1, why are Dr. Garneau's results not very useful?


There was no control group.

Results due to teaching method are confounded by the time of year the children were tested.

Children in Year 2 had the benefit of a different teaching method, so you can't compare them to children in Year 1.

Different children were used in each group, and this is a confound.
Textbook 
Psychology: Themes and Variations

Psychology: Themes and Variations


Edition: 5th
Authors:
Read 253 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
DEMarcet13DEMarcet13
wrote...
Posts: 114
Rep: 1 0
3 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

brendenxoxo21 Author
wrote...

3 years ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks for your help!!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  607 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 3
  
 910
  
 80
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 437

Previous poll results: What's your favorite math subject?