× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
6
y
2
m
2
m
2
u
2
m
2
B
2
M
2
e
2
k
2
N
2
y
2
New Topic  
datageekgh datageekgh
wrote...
12 years ago
I understand that in polar coordinate system, polar integration helps to find area under graph in instances where the equations in Cartesian coordinates are unable to do so when they form implicit equations, but what is the significance of Polar differentiation, the finding of tangent of a point on a polar plot, if it does not give the rate of change, but just merely the 'steepness' of a point?
If possible, it will be great to give other applications of polar integration as well!
Thank you!
Read 345 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
12 years ago
I think it is less a question of significance and more a question of convenience.  The cartesian coordinate system defines points in a very triangular way.  In essence you triangulate the position of each point.  For some functions this works really well.  For more circular and by extension spherical equations defining the functions differently the polar coordinates are easier to work with.  It is not a question of them being more or less useful, it is a question of the functions being easier to manipulate in polar.  
If you think about it, the slope in the cartesian plane  is dy/dx, change in vertical to change in horizontal.  In polar it is usually dr/d(theta), so it is the change in the radius from the origin as the angulation changes.  This would tell you something about the shape of the function you are looking at.  For example, a circle has constant radius, so dr/d(theta)=0.  Whereas an oval would change for all theta
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  582 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 1049
  
 408
  
 809
Your Opinion