Top Posters
Since Sunday
10
p
4
h
4
c
4
d
3
3
c
3
t
3
u
3
A
3
B
3
j
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
theGreek theGreek
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 2370
Rep: 1 0
7 years ago
In Johnson v. DeGrandy (1994), the Supreme Court ruled that
A) majority-minority districts were always constitutional.
B) state legislative redistricting plans do not violate the Voting Rights Act if they do not create the greatest possible number of districts in which minority group voters make a majority.
C) race should be the predominant factor in drawing district boundaries.
D) majority-minority districts were always unconstitutional.
E) state legislative redistricting plans violate the Voting Rights Act if they do not create the greatest possible number of districts in which minority group voters make a majority.
Read 182 times
2 Replies
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
NextiveNextive
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 834
Rep: 14 0
7 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

theGreek Author
wrote...
#2
7 years ago
Took a while to get back to you, my bad.

Thanks for helping me out, you're awesome
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  984 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 547
  
 4478
  
 324
Your Opinion
Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?
Votes: 146
Previous poll results: Do you trust social media networks with protecting your privacy?