(Solved) A and B have just signed a written agreement for the purchase by A of B's house. During the ...

A and B have just signed a written agreement for the purchase by A of B's house. During the negotiations, A made it clear to B that his purchase was conditional on A conducting a building inspection of house within five days of the date of the agreement, which was satisfactory to A. However, this condition is not included in the agreement. In this situation,
a. evidence of the building inspection would be admissible because it is a collateral agreement, the consideration for which is the agreement of purchase and sale.
b. evidence of the building inspection would not be admissible because, since this is an agreement for land, the Statute of Frauds applies to bar evidence of the building inspection.
c. evidence of the building inspection cannot be given because of the parol evidence rule.
d. evidence of the building inspection would be admissible because it is a subsequent agreement.
e. evidence of the building inspection would be admissible because it is a condition precedent to the agreement of purchase and sale.

Home Search Q & A Board Gallery Resource Library Blog Dictionary Chat	Quick Links Start a Topic Latest Topics Unanswered Questions Courses Study Tools Browse by Textbook	Social Facebook YouTube Community Stats Who's Online Trending Staff	Help About Us Take the Tour Study Tips Posting Guidelines Terms and Policies Contact Us
Biology Forums - Study Force © 2010-2024 \| Powered by SMF \| SMF © 2015, Simple Machines \| Sitemap Biology-Forums.com is not affiliated with any publisher. Book covers, title and author names appear for reference only.

A and B have just signed a written agreement for the purchase by A of B's house. During the ...

The Law and Business Administration in Canada

Related Topics