Top Posters
Since Sunday
y
2
m
2
m
2
u
2
m
2
B
2
M
2
e
2
k
2
N
2
y
2
m
2
New Topic  
Ashorn Ashorn
wrote...
Posts: 1043
Rep: 0 0
7 years ago
Peter was a coal merchant. In March 1962, he contracted to sell the business to his nephew John in consideration (1) that for the rest of Peter's life John should pay him $20.00 a week and (2) that if Peter's wife survived him, John should pay her an annual annuity of $15.00 a week. John took over the business and paid Peter the agreed sum until Peter died in November 1963. He then paid Peter's widow $15.00 for one week and refused to pay any more. The widow in both her personal capacity and as administratrix of Peter's estate brought an action against John in which she claimed all arrears under the annuity not paid her and asked for specific performance of the contract regarding the annuity. In this case,
a. the widow will succeed, but in her capacity as administratrix of Peter's estate only.
b. the widow will succeed, but in her personal capacity only.
c. the widow will not succeed because only Peter could enforce the contract with John.
d. the widow will not succeed because there is no privity between her and John.
e. none of the above
Textbook 
The Law and Business Administration in Canada

The Law and Business Administration in Canada


Edition: 14th
Authors:
Read 84 times
2 Replies
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
AlexStanfordAlexStanford
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 734
7 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

Ashorn Author
wrote...
6 years ago
you da best
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  581 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 419
  
 743
  
 417
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 488