Transcript
This lecture will help you understand:
Reasons for seeking alternative fuels
Contributions to world energy by alternative fuels
Nuclear energy
The social debate over nuclear energy
Biomass energy
Hydroelectric power
Central Case: Sweden’s search for alternative energy
In 1980, Sweden’s electorate voted to phase out nuclear energy, but it’s been difficult
The government has promoted the development of hydroelectric, biomass, and wind power
Sweden is an international leader in renewable energy alternatives, but it still relies on nuclear power
Alternatives to Fossil Fuels
80% of our energy comes from oil, coal, and natural gas
These three fuels also power two-thirds of the world’s electricity generation
Given fossil fuel’s substantial drawbacks, many people believe we need to shift to using less easily depleted and environmentally gentler fuels
Conventional alternatives
Three alternative energy sources are currently the most developed and most widely used: nuclear energy, hydroelectric power, and energy from biomass
These are all “conventional alternatives” to fossil fuels
They exert less environmental impact
Each has benefits and drawbacks
These are best viewed as intermediates along a continuum of renewability
Conventional alternatives provide energy
Fuelwood and other biomass sources provide 10% of the world’s energy, nuclear power provides 6.3%, and hydropower provides 2.2%
Nuclear energy and hydropower each account for nearly one-sixth of the world’s electricity generation
The U.S. relies on fossil fuels
The U.S. relies more on fossil fuels and nuclear power than other countries
Conventional alternatives play minor, yet substantial roles, in energy use
The use of conventional alternatives has been growing more slowly than fossil fuels
Nuclear Power
Public safety concerns and the costs of addressing them have constrained the development and spread of nuclear power in the United States, Sweden, and many other nations
20% of U.S. electricity comes from nuclear sources
France receives 78% of its electricity from nuclear power
Fission releases nuclear energy
Nuclear energy = the energy that holds together protons and neutrons within the nucleus of an atom
The reaction that drives the release of nuclear energy in power plants is nuclear fission = the splitting apart of atomic nuclei
Nuclear energy comes from uranium
Nuclear reactors = facilities within nuclear power plants
Nuclear fuel cycle = the process when naturally occurring uranium is mined from underground deposits
Radioisotopes = emit subatomic particles and high-energy radiation as they decay into lighter radioisotopes, ultimately becoming stable isotopes
Most spent fuel is disposed of as radioactive waste
Fission in reactors generates electricity
For fission to begin in a nuclear reactor, the neutrons bombarding uranium are slowed down with a substance called a moderator
Control rods = made of a metallic alloy that absorbs neutrons, and are placed into the reactor among the water-bathed fuel rods
Containment buildings are constructed to prevent leaks of radioactivity due to accidents or natural catastrophes such as earthquakes
A typical light water reactor
Natural Uranium must be Enriched
Breeder reactors make better use of fuel
Breeder reactors make use of U-238, which in conventional fission goes unused as a waste product
Breeder reactors are more dangerous than conventional reactors because highly reactive liquid sodium is used as a coolant, raising the risk of explosive accidents
They also are more expensive than conventional reactors
Highly reactive sodium, instead of water, is used as a coolant, raising the risk of explosive accidents
All but a handful of the world’s breeder reactors have now been shut down
Breeder Reaction
Fusion remains a dream
Nuclear fusion = the process that drives our Sun’s vast output of energy
The force behind hydrogen (thermonuclear) bombs
Involves forcing together the small nuclei of lightweight elements under extremely high temperature and pressure
If we could control fusion, we could produce vast amounts of energy from water
Nuclear power delivers energy cleanly
Nuclear power helps us avoid emitting 600 million metric tons of carbon each year
Equivalent to 8% of global greenhouse gas emissions
Nuclear power plants are safer for workers than coal-fired plants
Drawbacks of nuclear power:
Nuclear waste is radioactive
If an accident occurs at a power plant, the consequences can potentially be catastrophic
Today, the world has 436 operating nuclear plants in 30 nations
Coal versus nuclear power
More people die mining coal each year than have died in Nuclear power plant accidents in the entire history of Nuclear power.
The Bhopal chemical plant disaster killed more people than all the nuclear power incidents in history combined. This plant manufactured pesticides.
Nuclear power is not completely risk free, but it's much safer than most people give it credit for. Anyone who would picket a nuclear power plant before a coal plant or a pesticide plant is an uninformed twit.
Nuclear power also promises to get much safer. China is currently testing thorium reactors based on Canada's CANDU design. Thorium reactors have several safety advantages over Uranium reactors, produce less waste with a shorter half-life, and do not produce weapons-grade fissionable materials as a byproduct. Thorium is far more abundant than Uranium to boot. If Iran went after Thorium based nuclear power Israel would be able to sleep more easily at night
That statistic would be even more violently pro-nuclear -- you need to dig up roughly 20 000 times more coal than uranium to produce the similar amounts of energy, assuming a steam thermal coal plant and a light-water nuclear reactor.
If you swap that light-water plant to an advanced heavy water plant like CANDU, that multiplier goes up to about 2 000 000 times.
A fun fact: the extractable amount of energy in the trace radioactive elements (notably thorium) that is dug up with coal (and mostly distributed into the environment) is several times higher than the extractable energy content of the coal.
Nuclear power poses small risks
Nuclear power poses the possibility of catastrophic accidents
Spawning public anxiety over nuclear power
Three Mile Island was the most serious accident in the U.S.
Meltdown at Three Mile Island
Meltdown = coolant water drained from the reactor vessel, temperatures rose inside the reactor core, and metal surrounding the uranium fuel rods began to melt, releasing radiation
Three Mile Island is regarded as a near-miss: the emergency could have been far worse
The event raised safety concerns for U.S. citizens and policymakers
Chernobyl was the worst accident yet
The 1986 explosion at the Chernobyl plant in Ukraine caused the most severe nuclear power plant accident the world has ever seen
For 10 days, radiation escaped from the plant while crews tried to put out the fire
The Soviet Union evacuated more than 100,000 residents
The landscape around the plant for 19 miles remains contaminated
The accident killed 31 people directly and many became sick or developed cancer
The Chernobyl accident
The destroyed reactor was encased in a massive concrete sarcophagus to contain further leakage
Atmospheric currents carried radioactive fallout from Chernobyl across much of the Northern Hemisphere
Smaller-scale accidents have occurred
Although western reactors are far safer than Chernobyl, smaller accidents have occurred
A 1999 accident in Japan killed two workers and exposed 400 others to leaked radiation
As plants around the world age, they require more maintenance and are less safe
Recent terrorist attacks raised fears that similar attacks could be carried out against nuclear plants
Or stolen radioactive material could be used in attacks
The U.S. government’s “megatons to megawatts” program has been buying up radioactive material and using it in power plants
Waste disposal remains a problem
The long half-lives of uranium, plutonium, and other radioisotopes will cause them to continue emitting radiation for thousands of years
Radioactive waste must be placed in unusually stable and secure locations where radioactivity will not harm future generations
Nuclear waste from power generation is being held in temporary storage at nuclear power plants across the U.S. and the world
Spent fuel rods must be stored
Spent fuel rods are sunk in pools of cooling water to minimize radiation leakage
By 2010, 75% of U.S. plants will have no room left for this type of storage
They are now expanding their storage capacity by storing waste in thick casks of steel, lead, and concrete
U.S. power plants store tons of waste
U.S. power plants store 56,000 metric tons of high-level radioactive waste, as well as much more low-level radioactive waste
Waste is held at 125 sites in over 39 states
Most of these sites are vulnerable to terrorist attacks
Over 161 million U.S. citizens live within 75 miles of temporarily stored waste
Storage of high-level radioactive waste
Waste storage at Yucca Mountain, Nevada
Nuclear waste managers want to send all waste to a central repository that can be heavily guarded
Yucca Mountain, Nevada, was recommended by the president and approved by Congress
It’s waiting approval from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to become the site that receives waste from nuclear reactors and military installations
Yucca Mountain, Nevada
Scientists and policymakers chose Yucca Mountain
It is 14 miles to the nearest year-round residences
It has stable geology, with minimal risk of earthquakes that could damage the tunnels and release radioactivity
Its dry climate should minimize water infiltration, reducing chances of groundwater contamination
The water table is deep underground, making groundwater contamination less likely
The pool of groundwater does not connect with groundwater elsewhere, so any contamination would be contained
The location on federal land can be protected from sabotage
Concerns with Yucca Mountain as a site
Some argue that earthquakes and volcanic activity could destabilize the site’s geology
They also fear that fissures in the mountain’s rock could allow rainwater to seep into the caverns
Nuclear waste will need to be transported to Yucca Mountain from the 120-some current storage areas and from current and future nuclear plants and military installations
Shipments by rail and truck across thousands of public highways through all the states in the union cause a high risk of accident or sabotage
Dilemmas have slowed nuclear power’s growth
It is enormously expensive to build, maintain, operate, and ensure the safety of nuclear facilities
Shutting down (decommissioning) plants can be more expensive than construction
Electricity is more expensive than from coal and other sources
Nuclear power plants in Western Europe will be retired by 2030
Asian nations are increasing nuclear capacity; 15 to 26 plants are under construction
The future of U.S. nuclear energy
The U.S. nuclear industry has stopped building plants
Expanding nuclear capacity would decrease reliance on fossil fuels
Engineers are planning ways to make nuclear power plants safer and less expensive
Biomass energy
Biomass energy has great potential for addressing our energy challenges
Biomass = organic material that makes up living organisms
People harness biomass energy from many types of plant matter
Wood from trees, charcoal from burned wood, and matter from agricultural crops, as well as combustible animal waste products
Biomass from decomposition
Waste management systems like landfills and wastewater treatment plants use decomposing microbes to create methane for energy
Biomass sources are widely used
More than 1 billion people use wood from trees as their principal energy source
In developing nations, families gather fuelwood for heating, cooking, and lighting
Fuelwood, charcoal, and manure account for 35% of energy use
Fuelwood and other biomass sources constitute 80% of all renewable energy used worldwide
Biomass can be overharvested
Biomass is only renewable when it is not overharvested
With rapid deforestation, soil erosion, and forest failures to regrow, biomass is not replenished
As developing nations industrialize, fossil fuels are replacing traditional energy sources
Biomass use is growing more slowly than overall energy use
New biomass strategies
Biomass sources include a variety of materials
Biopower = produced when biomass sources are burned in power plants, generating heat and electricity
Biofuels = biomass sources converted into fuels to power automobiles
Biofuels can power automobiles
Ethanol = produces as a biofuel by fermenting carbohydrate-rich crops
Ethanol is widely added to U.S. gasoline to reduce emissions
Any vehicle will run well on a 10% ethanol mix
Cars can run on ethanol
Flexible fuel vehicles = run on 85% ethanol
But, very few gas stations offer this fuel
Researchers are refining techniques to produce ethanol from cellulose, so ethanol could be made from low-value crops, instead of high-value crops
Biodiesel is produced from vegetable oil
U.S. biodiesel producers use soybean oil
Animal fats, used grease, and cooking oil can also be used
Vehicles can run on 100% biodiesel, but the engine needs to be modified
Biodiesel cuts down on emissions; its fuel economy is almost as good and costs slightly more than gasoline
Biopower generates electricity
Many sources of biomass can be used
Waste products of existing industries or processes
Woody debris from logging operations and sawmills
Crops can be specifically grown, such as fast-growing willow trees or bamboo
Co-firing combines biomass with coal
Bacterial breakdown of waste to produce methane
Biomass energy brings benefits
It is essentially carbon-neutral, releasing no net carbon into the atmosphere
Only if biomass sources are not overharvested
Capturing landfill gases reduces methane emissions
Economic benefits include
Supporting rural communities
Reducing dependence of fossil fuel imports
Improved energy efficiency
Reduces air pollutants such as sulfur dioxide
Drawbacks of biomass energy
Health hazards from indoor air pollution
Rapid harvesting can lead to deforestation
Growing crops exerts tremendous impacts on ecosystems
Fertilizers and pesticides
Land is converted to agriculture
Biofuel is competing with food production
Substantial inputs of energy are required
Hydroelectric power
Hydroelectric power = uses the kinetic energy of moving water to turn turbines and generate electricity
Storage technique = impoundments harness energy by storing water in reservoirs behind dams
Water passing through the dam turns turbines
Run-of-river approaches generates energy without greatly disrupting the flow of river water
A typical dam
A run-of-river system
Hydroelectric power is widely used
Hydropower accounts for 2.2% of the world’s energy supply
And 16% of the world’s electricity production
Nations with large rivers and economic resources have used dams
However, many countries have dammed their large rivers
People want some rivers left undammed
Hydropower is clean and renewable
Hydropower has two clear advantages over fossil fuels for producing electricity:
It is renewable: as long as precipitation fills rivers we can use water to turn turbines
It is clean: no carbon dioxide is emitted
Hydropower is efficient
It has an EROI of 10:1, as high as any modern-day energy source
Hydropower has negative impacts
Damming rivers destroys habitats
Upstream areas are submerged
Downstream areas are starved of water
Natural flooding cycles are disrupted
Thermal pollution of downstream water
Periodic flushes of cold reservoir water can kill fish
Dams block passage of fish, fragmenting the river and reducing biodiversity
Hydropower may not expand much more
China’s Three Gorges Dam is the world’s largest dam
Most of the world’s large rivers have already been dammed
People have grown aware of the ecological impact of dams
Developing nations will probably increase hydropower if they have rivers
Conclusion
With limited fossil fuel supplies, nations are trying to diversify their energy portfolios
Nuclear power showed promise, but high costs and public fears stalled its growth
Biomass energy sources include traditional wood and newer biofuels
Hydropower is a renewable, pollution-free alternative, but it can involve substantial ecological impacts
QUESTION: Review
Which of the following is not a benefit of conventional alternative fuels?
They exert less environmental impact than fossil fuels
They are best viewed as intermediate sources of fuel
They are best viewed as final sources of fuel
Each energy source has benefits for the environment
QUESTION: Review
The reaction that drives the release of energy in nuclear power plants is….
Nuclear fission
Nuclear fusion
Control rods
Nuclear emergencies
QUESTION: Review
Why are nuclear power plants not supported in the U.S.?
Fears about accidents
Nuclear waste issues
High costs of building and maintaining plants
All are issues regarding nuclear energy
QUESTION: Review
Yucca Mountain, Nevada, is the site selected for permanent radioactive waste disposal. Which of the following is not a reason for selecting this site?
It is remote
Its wet climate should minimize water contamination
The water table is deep underground
It has minimal risk of earthquakes
QUESTION: Review
Ethanol in the U.S. is made mainly from ______, and is used to ______
Soybeans, heat homes
Sugar cane, drive cars
Corn, drive cars
Willow trees, make electricity
QUESTION: Review
Which of the following is not a benefit of hydropower?
It produces carbon dioxide
It is a clean source of energy
It is renewable
All of these are benefits of hydropower
QUESTION: Weighing the Issues
Given the choice of living next to a coal-burning power plant or nuclear plant, which would you choose?
The nuclear plant, because it’s cleaner
The coal plant, because it won’t emit radioactive materials
Neither one; I’d move to another place
Either one; I don’t care
QUESTION: Interpreting Graphs and Data
If ethanol in the U.S. is produced from corn, a drawback suggested from this graph could be:
a) More corn is available
b) More competition between food and fuel
c) Less land planted in corn
d) None of these