× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
o
4
b
4
4
s
3
j
3
b
3
m
3
K
3
g
3
L
3
w
3
m
3
New Topic  
aliya99 aliya99
wrote...
Posts: 597
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
A QUESTION OF ETHICS
  Crawford, a certified public accountant, prepared a financial statement for Erps Construction Co, which was seeking a loan from First National Bank of Bluefield. Crawford knew at the time he prepared the statement that the bank would rely on the statement in making its decision on whether to extend credit to Erps. The bank later sued Crawford, alleging that he had been pro-fessionally negligent in preparing the financial statement, upon which the bank had relied in determining whether to give the construction company a loan. Crawford defended against the suit by asserting that he could not be liable to the bank because of lack of privity. The trial court ruled that in the absence of contractual privity between the parties, the bank could not recover from the accountant. On appeal, the appellate court adopted the rule enunciated by the Re-statement (Second) of Torts in regard to a professional's liability to third parties.
Read 53 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
Mmm23Mmm23
wrote...
Posts: 220
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
This verified answer contains over 520 words.
1

Related Topics

aliya99 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
You make an excellent tutor!
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks for your help!!
wrote...

2 hours ago
This site is awesome
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1176 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 66
  
 121
  
 293
Your Opinion
What's your favorite funny biology word?
Votes: 336