× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
2
g
1
D
1
New Topic  
Valentine11 Valentine11
wrote...
Posts: 556
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
TP sells franchises in the Old Fast Food chain. TP sells a franchise to Choi for 100,000 by cashier's check. Choi then hears that TP is going out of business and tries to stop payment on the check. TP has already transferred the money to a third party who meets the UCC's requirements for a holder in due course. The bank paid that third party. TP declares it is out of business. In a subsequent lawsuit:
 a. the court will find that the third party is a holder in due course and, despite the fact that TP has defraudedChoi, not require the third party to repay Choi
 b. because of the fraud involved, the court will require the third party repay Choi
  c. because the instrument involved was a cashier's check and not an ordinary check, the court will not require the third party to repay Choi
  d. because the amount in controversy was more than 50,000, the courts will be empowered to view the fraud as a felony and will ignore the requirements of the UCC
  e. none of the other choices
Read 61 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
KojicoKojico
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1145
Rep: 6 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Valentine11 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
You make an excellent tutor!
wrote...

Yesterday
Smart ... Thanks!
wrote...

2 hours ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1145 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 246
  
 255
  
 141
Your Opinion
Which 'study break' activity do you find most distracting?
Votes: 820