× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
o
1
1
New Topic  
BohnBayne BohnBayne
wrote...
Posts: 599
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Barnes agrees with Morgan to enter into the management of a new subdivision of residential housing. Morgan appoints Barnes as his manager for the duration of the development program. During the course of the construction, Barnes decides to use funds specified for the subdivision for an office space project that Barnes alone has been interested in completing. Morgan is very angry on learning of Barnes' actions and terminates the agency. Barnes insists that the agency cannot be terminated in this manner. Is Barnes correct?
Read 28 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
No. Morgan hired Barnes to manage a new subdivision. Barnes has been authorized to transact all affairs in connection with the subdivision. As such, Barnes is a general agent. In most cases, either party to an agency relationship has the power to terminate that relationship at any time. Therefore, Morgan has the power to terminate the agency. However, there is a possibility of liability for damages if the termination was not accomplished in a lawful manner. Given the fact that Barnes has been engaged in misconduct, the discharge of Barnes will be without liability. Care should be taken to ensure that third parties are given notice of the agency termination.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  789 People Browsing
 148 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 184
  
 44
  
 306
Your Opinion
Who will win the 2024 president election?
Votes: 8
Closes: November 4