× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
c
6
r
4
c
3
m
3
h
3
1
3
n
3
s
3
d
3
c
3
a
3
r
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
tjjt tjjt
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 658
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Gaskin v. Stumm Handel GmbH, the District Court ruled:
 A) that employment contracts must be in writing.
 B) that the plaintiff was excused from performing a contract written in German because he understood only English.
 C) that the contract was unconscionable because it was written in a language foreign to the plaintiff.
 D) that the plaintiff's signing of a jural document makes the signatory conclusively bound.
Read 53 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
CricooCricoo
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 665
Rep: 3 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

tjjt Author
wrote...

6 years ago
This helped my grade so much Perfect
mambah4
wrote...

Yesterday
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
linlinlin
wrote...

2 hours ago
Brilliant ツ
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1472 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 900
  
 326
  
 1226
Your Opinion
Previous poll results: What's your favorite coffee beverage?