Top Posters
Since Sunday
T
3
s
3
o
3
G
3
k
3
C
3
a
3
K
3
f
3
j
3
b
3
c
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
Ashorn Ashorn
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 1043
Rep: 0 0
7 years ago
Phil was riding his motorcycle home from work when he was involved in a motor vehicle accident. As he lay on the road injured, he was attended to by two different motorists who stopped after seeing the accident. Additionally, an overhead helicopter from the local TV news station was broadcasting live on air. Suddenly, a second vehicle careened out of control and ran over Phil killing him instantly. Given concerns about proximity, foreseeability, and policy reasons, of all the people who suffered nervous shock, who would be most likely to recover compensation in a court action against the reckless driver of the second vehicle that caused Phil’s death?
a. Claims by the two motorists who were assisting Phil at the scene.
b. Claims by the people who witnessed the incident on TV.
c. Claims by the ambulance attendants who arrived 10 minutes after Phil died.
d. Claims by those who read the story and saw pictures in the paper the following day.
Textbook 
The Law and Business Administration in Canada

The Law and Business Administration in Canada


Edition: 14th
Authors:
Read 53 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
Existence87Existence87
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 629
Rep: 21 0
7 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

Ashorn Author
wrote...

7 years ago
Good timing, thanks!
Fleury
wrote...

Yesterday
This site is awesome
Starfiew
wrote...

2 hours ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  853 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 330
  
 1025
  
 422