× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
y
2
m
2
m
2
u
2
m
2
B
2
M
2
e
2
k
2
N
2
y
2
m
2
New Topic  
fatman fatman
wrote...
Posts: 794
Rep: 0 0
7 years ago
In a study of Canadian provincial court judges by Palys and Divorski (1986), each judge participant was provided with 5 different criminal cases (and surrounding information). The judges were asked impose a sentence for each offender and indicate what facts they considered relevant in their decision-making (i.e., legal objectives, case facts, and demographic information). What component of the judge’s decision-making was the most important predictor of sentencing severity?
a. Differential weighting of legal objectives
b. Over-consideration of the race of the defendant
c. Selective attention to facts only the judge considered relevant
d. Inconsistent or unclear case facts
e. An interaction between the gender of the defendant and the type of crime
Read 99 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
7 years ago
a
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  561 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 794
  
 787
  
 795
Your Opinion
What's your favorite funny biology word?
Votes: 401

Previous poll results: Do you believe in global warming?