In Fresenius Medical Care Holdings v. Tucker, where a Florida law prohibited physicians from having ...

In Fresenius Medical Care Holdings v. Tucker, where a Florida law prohibited physicians from having a significant financial interest in businesses to which patients were referred, the appeals court held that:
 a. substantive due process was not violated as the rational basis inquiry showed the regulation to meet a legitimate legislative objective
  b. substantive due process was violated as the rational basis inquiry showed the regulation did not meet a legitimate legislative objective
  c. substantive due process was violated because the state legislature interfered with a matter subject only to federal regulation
  d. substantive due process was not violated as Congress expressly allows state legialstures to regulate the operation of the medical profession
  e. none of the other choices are correct