× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
A
6
j
6
c
5
m
5
C
5
d
5
s
5
n
4
i
4
d
4
d
4
J
4
New Topic  
SDINIC89 SDINIC89
wrote...
Posts: 682
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
The Supreme Court has ruled that a state statute which permits police to require a suspect disclose his identity during a Terry stop or face prosecution for failing to answer is:
 
  a. unconstitutional because people are not obliged to respond to an officer's questions.
  b. unconstitutional because it violates the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
  c. constitutional because it is rationally related to the purpose and practical demands of a Terry stop.
  d. constitutional only if the state supreme court has ruled that it is.
Read 26 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
KomallKomall
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 925
Rep: 5 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

SDINIC89 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
wrote...

Yesterday
Brilliant
wrote...

2 hours ago
You make an excellent tutor!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  849 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 256
  
 874
  
 265
Your Opinion
Which 'study break' activity do you find most distracting?
Votes: 820