Top Posters
Since Sunday
w
3
w
3
e
3
3
r
3
g
2
2
b
2
M
2
V
2
f
2
c
2
New Topic  
Nica Nica
wrote...
Posts: 520
4 years ago
A high school biology student wishes to test the hypothesis that hummingbird feeders can affect the mean mass of ruby-throated hummingbirds in the area surrounding the feeder. She captures and weighs several of the hummingbirds near a science museum where several feeders are located. She obtains the following masses in grams:


The student's hypotheses are:
H0: μ = 3.65 g
Ha: μ > 3.65 g
Use technology to calculate the P-value, then determine whether the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean mass of the birds in the area surrounding the feeder is greater than the mean mass of the general population. Test at the 5% significance level and assume that the population standard deviation is 0.35 g. Also, assess the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis.

▸ P = 0.509; since P > 0.05, reject the null hypothesis.
At the 5% significance level, the data do provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean mass of the birds in the area surrounding the feeder is greater than the mean mass of the general population. The evidence against the null hypothesis is strong.

▸ P = 0.745; since P > 0.05, do not reject the null hypothesis.
At the 5% significance level, the data do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean mass of the birds in the area surrounding the feeder is greater than the mean mass of the general population. The evidence against the null hypothesis is weak or none.

▸ P = 0.255; since P > 0.05, reject the null hypothesis.
At the 5% significance level, the data do provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean mass of the birds in the area surrounding the feeder is greater than the mean mass of the general population. The evidence against the null hypothesis is moderate.

▸ P = 0.1418; since P > 0.05, do not reject the null hypothesis.
At the 5% significance level, the data do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean mass of the birds in the area surrounding the feeder is greater than the mean mass of the general population. The evidence against the null hypothesis is weak or none.
Textbook 
Introductory Statistics

Introductory Statistics


Edition: 10th
Author:
Read 64 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
krobdancekrobdance
wrote...
Posts: 396
4 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
,  bio_man

Related Topics

Nica Author
wrote...

4 years ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
wrote...

Yesterday
This helped my grade so much Perfect
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  456 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 313
  
 270
  
 76
Your Opinion
What's your favorite coffee beverage?
Votes: 305