× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
G
4
K
3
m
2
c
2
r
2
p
2
s
2
s
2
b
2
c
2
R
2
c
2
New Topic  
DDahl DDahl
wrote...
Posts: 361
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Without authorization, a nurse administers an extra dose of narcotic tranquilizer to an agitated client. The nurse's coworker observes this action but does nothing for fear of retaliation.
 
  What is the ethical interpretation of the coworker's lack of involvement? 1. Taking no action is still considered an unethical action by the coworker.
  2. Taking no action releases the coworker from ethical responsibility.
  3. Taking no action is advised when potential adverse consequences are foreseen.
  4. Taking no action is acceptable, because the coworker is only a bystander.
Read 28 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
kddkdd
wrote...
Posts: 415
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

DDahl Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thanks
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
wrote...

2 hours ago
This calls for a celebration Person Raising Both Hands in Celebration
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1091 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 957
  
 2067
  
 312
Your Opinion
Which country would you like to visit for its food?
Votes: 261