× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
T
3
s
3
o
3
G
3
k
3
C
3
a
3
K
3
f
3
j
3
b
3
c
3
New Topic  
11202017 11202017
wrote...
6 years ago
Without obtaining proper authorization by a physician, a nurse administers an extra dose of narcotic tranquilizer to an agitated elderly client who cursed at her.
 
  A coworker recognizes that an ethical/legal infraction has occurred but fears repercussions if he gets involved. Which is the correct ethical interpretation of the coworker's lack of involvement?
  A) Taking no action is still considered an action taken by the coworker.
  B) Taking no action releases the coworker from ethical responsibility.
  C) Taking no action is advised when potential adverse consequences are foreseen for the coworker.
  D) Taking no action is acceptable since the coworker is only a bystander.
Read 45 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
A
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1111 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 220
  
 446
  
 683
Your Opinion
Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?
Votes: 146