× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Business
New Topic  
Irrelevantshine Irrelevantshine
wrote...
Posts: 651
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Was the Court of Appeals correct in setting aside the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff because there must be a complete expectation of privacy to recover intrusion and other employees could hear the conversations in question?
Read 31 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
#1
6 years ago
The Court of Appeals was in error requiring a complete expectation of privacy and the Supreme Court of California remanded the case to that court for further proceedings. The Supreme Court held that an employee may, under some circumstances, have a reasonable expectation of visual or aural privacy against electronic intrusion by a stranger to the workplace despite the fact that the conversations could be witnessed by coworkers or the employer. (Lescht worked at PMG only for a few days and acted solely as an agent of ABC.)
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1267 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 719
  
 378
  
 368
Your Opinion
Which of the following is the best resource to supplement your studies:
Votes: 292
Previous poll results: Which 'study break' activity do you find most distracting?