× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
New Topic  
zainwadi zainwadi
wrote...
Posts: 320
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co v. Wood, where Zambelli sued Wood for violating the noncompete agreement in his contract, the appeals court held that:
 a. the noncompete agreement was void because it violated common law policies b. the noncompete agreement was void because it violated public policy
  c. Wood's specialized knowledge from working at Zambelli, but not customer goodwill, constituted a legitimate business interest that Zambelli had a right to protect through a reasonable restrictive covenant
  d. Wood's specialized knowledge from working at Zambelli and established customer goodwill did not constitute legitimate business interests that Zambelli had a right to protect through a reasonable restrictive covenant
  e. none of the other choices are correct
Read 69 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
ChloeSiameseChloeSiamese
wrote...
Posts: 442
Rep: 4 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

zainwadi Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Smart ... Thanks!
wrote...

Yesterday
Helped a lot
wrote...

2 hours ago
this is exactly what I needed
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1257 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 602
  
 8555
  
 15913
Your Opinion
What's your favorite math subject?
Votes: 293