× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
w
3
w
3
e
3
3
r
3
g
2
2
b
2
M
2
V
2
f
2
c
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
saadaj saadaj
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 535
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In United States v. Mead Corporation, where Mead sued Customs when it changed the classification of the planners Mead imported which resulted in Mead having to pay a 4 tariff, the Supreme Court held that:
 a. the case should be reevaluated in the Court of Appeals using the Skidmore standard b. the case should be thrown out for lack of evidence
  c. all rulings by Customs are equivalent to federal law so Mead had no case d. Mead should pay a 2 tariff as a compromise
  e. the change in classification was unjustified so Mead did not owe any tariffs
Read 72 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
gool34gool34
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1186
Rep: 3 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

saadaj Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thanks
big_larry_samp
wrote...

Yesterday
You make an excellent tutor!
oscar520000
wrote...

2 hours ago
This calls for a celebration Person Raising Both Hands in Celebration
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  421 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 322
  
 7106
  
 798
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 437
Previous poll results: How often do you eat-out per week?