× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
s
3
v
3
p
3
m
2
s
2
d
2
N
2
d
2
e
2
s
2
s
2
e
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
saadaj saadaj
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 535
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In United States v. Mead Corporation, where Mead sued Customs when it changed the classification of the planners Mead imported which resulted in Mead having to pay a 4 tariff, the Supreme Court held that:
 a. the case should be reevaluated in the Court of Appeals using the Skidmore standard b. the case should be thrown out for lack of evidence
  c. all rulings by Customs are equivalent to federal law so Mead had no case d. Mead should pay a 2 tariff as a compromise
  e. the change in classification was unjustified so Mead did not owe any tariffs
Read 71 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
gool34gool34
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1186
Rep: 3 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

saadaj Author
wrote...

6 years ago
You make an excellent tutor!
Shassta22
wrote...

Yesterday
this is exactly what I needed
gmiannotti
wrote...

2 hours ago
Brilliant ツ
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1082 People Browsing
 151 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 279
  
 331
  
 14274
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 436
Previous poll results: Which 'study break' activity do you find most distracting?