× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
p
4
h
4
c
4
d
3
3
c
3
t
3
u
3
A
3
B
3
j
3
s
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
ruthayak ruthayak
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 580
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Cox engaged Datz as her agent. It was mutually agreed that Datz would not disclose that he was acting as Cox's agent. Instead, he was to deal with prospective customers as if he were a principal acting on his own behalf. This he did and made several contracts for Cox. Assuming Cox, Datz, or the customer seeks to avoid liability on one of the contracts involved, which of the following statements is correct?
 a. Cox must ratify the Datz contracts in order to be held liable.
  b. Datz has no liability once he discloses that Cox was the real principal.
  c. The third party can avoid liability because he believed he was dealing with Datz as a principal.
  d. The third party may choose to hold either Datz or Cox liable.
Read 40 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
lmcdon20lmcdon20
wrote...
#1
Posts: 454
Rep: 1 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

ruthayak Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Brilliant ツ
annabananerz
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
Ivansitospeed@g
wrote...

2 hours ago
this is exactly what I needed
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1054 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 181
  
 1063
  
 708
Your Opinion
Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?
Votes: 146
Previous poll results: Who's your favorite biologist?