× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
1
e
1
a
1
1
1
New Topic  
WENLiu WENLiu
wrote...
Posts: 538
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Acceptance. In April 1996, Excalibur Oil Group, Inc, applied for credit and opened an account with Standard Distributors, Inc, to obtain snack foods and other items for Excalibur's convenience stores. For three months, Standard delivered the goods and Excalibur paid the invoices. In July, Standard was dissolved and its assets were distributed to J. F. Walker Co Walker continued to deliver the goods to Excalibur, which continued to pay the invoices until November, when the firm began to experience financial difficulties. By January 1997, Excalibur owed Walker 54,241.77. Walker then dealt with Excalibur soley on a collect-on-delivery basis until Excalibur's stores closed in 1998. Walker filed a suit in a Pennsylvania state court against Excalibur and its owner to recover amounts due on the unpaid invoices. To successfully plead its case, Walker had to show that there was a contract between the parties. One question was whether Excalibur had manifested acceptance of the goods delivered by Walker. How does a buyer manifest acceptance? Was there an acceptance in this case? In whose favor should the court rule, and why?
Read 23 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
trxozandeniztrxozandeniz
wrote...
Posts: 229
Rep: 1 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
This verified answer contains over 220 words.
1

Related Topics

WENLiu Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thanks
wrote...

Yesterday
Correct Slight Smile TY
wrote...

2 hours ago
Good timing, thanks!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  915 People Browsing
 117 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 55
  
 165
  
 218
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 422

Previous poll results: Where do you get your textbooks?